Sunday, July 31, 2016
Feedly vs Inoreader my thoughts part 1
Feedly vs Inoreader my thoughts part 1
Note: This is Part 1 in my humble series, as I agonize over whether to commit to Feedly or Inoreader as my RSS reader of choice. See Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Part 5 if youre interested.
When Google Reader died, I was heartbroken. Luckily, like a rebound lover, Feedly was there to pick up the pieces and make me feel all warm and safe. However, as time has gone on, Feedly has started to seem to lose interest in me, pushing me into the arms of another lover: Inoreader.
Basically it comes down to one key point: each RSS readers treatment of "small time" feeds. What I mean are those feeds that are maybe not updated very often, such as once a month or once every two months, and those feeds with very few subscribers (including, but not limited to, feeds for which I might be the sole subscriber).
Examples of what I mean include:
- Reddit subreddits that have just a few new posts each month
- Blogger and Wordpress comment feeds (subscribing via RSS to new comments on specific posts)
- Sourceforge application update feeds
- Craigslist search results feeds
- Blogs of some personal friends
Putting them to the test: Inoreader on top
So Ive tried out Inoreader for the last two weeks. Basically, I pared down my subscribed feeds, cleared them all out, then started fresh on both services by importing the same OPML file into both, and watching the results.After two weeks of this, it became clear: many of my "smaller" feeds were being ignored by Feedly. One or two had "feed issues" (the Reddit feeds) according to Inoreaders informative subscription management pane, but were nonetheless being fetched by Inoreader.
Here you can see the relative fetching speed of each service. I erased all my subscriptions, loaded a fresh OPML subscription list (a smaller one than I usually use, just 20 feeds) into each service, then waited two hours. Here was the result:
Feedly |
Inoreader |
You can see that Inoreader did a better job of feed fetching.
Some thoughts about both: Feedlys revenge
This may seem that I am overwhelmingly in favor of Inoreader, but thats not exactly true. Im still a bit on the fence, and heres why:- Feedly, for better or worse, seems the dominant player in RSS feed readers, which is a small enough field not to permit too many competitors. Most Google Reader refugees originally fled to Feedly. This may change in the future (Inoreader seems right on its tail, which to me suggests that others are migrating as well), but for now Im still hesitant to leave behind the large and potentially more stable Feedly in favor of yet another newer reader.
- Feedly is more beautiful. This may not be an important factor for some, but I personally find Feedly to be the more "readable" of the two. It feels a little more slick, a little more polished, a little more concerned with appearances. And to me, as someone who reads hundreds of feeds a day, that matters. Inoreader is not ugly by any means. Its really just a personal preference. The font, the transitions, the design, seems smoother, especially in the Android app, on Feedly than Inoreader. This may change when Inoreaders update comes out.
- Feedburner. Going through my subscription list, I discovered many blogs for which I was subscribed to the blogs own RSS feed (like blog.com/feed) but that the blog also has a Feedburner feed. Switching my subscription to the Feedburner feed improved Feedlys performance in fetching articles, especially infrequently-updated blogs.
- IFTTT. For feeds that are rarely updates or unique to me, Ive found that IFTTTs "feed" channel is equal to Inoreader at fetching articles from sources quickly and accurately. Thus Ive just created IFTTT recipes for those problematic few feeds, so I now have new posts e-mailed to me. This has the fringe benefit of drawing more attention to these infrequently-appearing posts, which I might have inadvertently scrolled past in an RSS reader.
Final thoughts
After all this, I find myself leaning towards Feedly still. Ive been with them since Google Reader, and feel willing to give them one more shot. Of course, until Im more confident about the quality of their service, theres no way Im buying a pro plan, even if Id like to. Too risky to invest in a service I might soon see a need to flee from. Maybe they can change their ways, or maybe Im going back to an abusive relationship and will long to get out again soon and into the sexy seductive arms of Inoreader. Either way, its great that both of these services allow import/export of your OPML reading list, so that moving between them is fairly painless (unless you have a lot of tagged, saved articles you also want migrated, in which only Inoreader supports it.)Expect a follow-up post in a few months.
UPDATE 2014-11-06: And the follow-up post is complete. For more of my comparisons, see this series Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Part 5 if youre interested.
=====
This post is from the blog 10? Tips, by Sam Nordberg. See the original there, and follow me on Facebook or Twitter @10wontips.
This post is from the blog 10? Tips, by Sam Nordberg. See the original there, and follow me on Facebook or Twitter @10wontips.